George Allen Statement on Washington’s Debt Ceiling Deal

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
August 1, 2011


    

George Allen Statement on Washington’s Debt Ceiling Deal

Henrico, VA – George Allen issued the following statement on Washington’s debt ceiling deal:

“After months of pushing our economy to the brink, Washington has yet again failed to deliver a long-term solution to our debt crisis.  This 11th hour deal fails to address the country’s serious fiscal problems, has no concrete Balanced Budget Amendment, and punts the tough decisions to yet another commission while adding nearly a trillion dollars more to our nation’s debt as they deliberate. 

“No doubt as we’ve witnessed time and time again – including the last several weeks – Senate Democrats will use this new commission to continue their push for job-killing tax increases as the answer to our country’s problems.   And if they fail to reach an agreement, significant cuts will be made to defense spending, risking our troop’s safety and seriously threatening Virginia jobs.  Meanwhile, American job opportunities are diminishing, our economy is on a downward spiral, and Americans are paying high fuel prices that are hurting already strained family budgets.

“We need to bring accountability to Washington by changing who controls the U.S. Senate so we can finally pass a Balanced Budget Amendment, block job-killing tax hikes and unleash our American energy resources for jobs, lower prices, competitiveness and raising billions in revenues without raising taxes.  We can’t allow Washington to force our children to shoulder the burdens of their continued failures.” 

###

Investors.com: What Expansion?

We have high unemployment & underemployment in this terrible economy due to Washington’s rampant desire to raise taxes, increase regulatory & health care burdens, and impose a counterproductive, punishing energy policy. Add to that exploding annual deficit spending with the rapid expansion of government and resulting dangerous levels of debt. This editorial is right – these policies have been an utter failure.

What Expansion?

Investors.com

July 29, 2011

Obamanomics: In case you thought the economy was doing better, Friday’s report on gross domestic product likely disabused you of that notion. It shows the last two years of economic policymaking have been an utter failure.

New data show that the economy has been expanding far less robustly over the past two and a half years than initially claimed.

According to the Commerce Department, first-quarter GDP growth was 0.4%, not 1.9% as first reported. In the second quarter, it grew at a tepid 1.3% pace.

A recent problem? Hardly. Fourth-quarter 2010 growth was also revised down, from 3.1% to 2.3%.

In fact, all told, from the end of 2008 to this year, the government estimates U.S. GDP was $314 billion less than first estimated, not including this year’s revisions.

Digging down into the data shows an even gloomier picture. Per capita GDP, the ultimate measure of both well-being and productivity for a nation, today remains lower in real terms than it was in 2007.

In the second quarter of this year, average annual real output per person stood at $42,499 — still 3.3% below its peak of $43,956 in the fourth quarter of 2007.

Click Here to continue reading

Washington Is Making Things Worse

The disappointing 1.3% growth in the GDP, which comes on the heels of anemic jobs numbers weeks ago, is another disheartening sign that our nation is headed in the wrong direction.  It’s clear that our economy is stalling and job growth along with it.  Others have proposed higher taxes, which would put a strangle-hold on job-creating businesses and lead to perpetually high unemployment. Washington’s recent spending binge — failed stimulus, costly healthcare scheme, annual trillion dollar deficits — have done nothing to turn the economy around, in fact they have made things worse.

Economic growth tepid as spending flat

Reuters

By Lucia Mutikani

July 29, 2011

Reuters) – The economy grew less than expected in the second quarter as consumer spending barely rose amid higher gasoline prices, and growth braked sharply in the prior quarter, a government report showed on Friday.

Growth in gross domestic product — a measure of all goods and services produced within U.S. borders – rose at a 1.3 percent annual rate, the Commerce Department said. First-quarter output was sharply revised down to a 0.4 percent pace from 1.9 percent.

Economists had expected the economy to expand at a 1.8 percent rate in the second quarter.

In addition, fourth-quarter growth was revised down to a 2.3 percent pace from 3.1 percent, indicating that the economy had already started slowing before the high gasoline prices and supply chain disruptions from Japan hit.

Economists had expected the economy would show signs of perking up by now with Japan supply constraints easing and gasoline prices off their high, but data has disappointed. This and the sharp downward revisions to the prior quarters suggest a more troubling and fundamental slowdown might be underway.

There is also heightened uncertainty over the outlook because of the impasse in talks to raise the nation’s borrowing limit and avoid a damaging government debt default.

The Treasury says the government will soon run out of money to pay all its bills.

Click Here to continue reading

Column: Will Obama ever learn economics from Reagan?

Good insight from Edwin Meese III and Michael Needham about why Washington can’t be trusted – especially when it comes to tax hikes and spending cuts.  One thing we know for certain is that raising taxes would hurt the economy and strangle already anemic job creation.  Mr. Meese also points out that Washington can’t be trusted to follow through on reining in wasteful spending which is why we need a Balanced Budget Amendment with taxpayer protection – it is only long-term solution that will force Washington to live within its means.   

 

Will Obama ever learn economics from Reagan?

By Edwin Meese III and Michael Needham

USA Today

July 22, 2011

The centennial of Ronald Reagan’s birth earlier this year brought an unusual sight: a round of press reports noting President Obama’s admiration for his predecessor, including one he penned for this newspaper.

Despite their stark differences on policy, Obama praised Reagan for how he led the nation “through an extremely difficult period, with economic hardship at home and very real threats beyond our borders.” And, lo and behold, many pundits are now comparing what they call Reagan’s willingness to compromise on taxes to what they say is the intransigence of today’s GOP.

In addition to its own editorials, USA TODAY publishes a variety of opinions from outside writers. On political and policy matters, we publish opinions from across the political spectrum.

Roughly half of our columns come from our Board of Contributors, a group whose interests range from education to religion to sports to the economy. Their charge is to chronicle American culture by telling the stories, large and small, that collectively make us what we are.

We also publish weekly columns by Al Neuharth, USA TODAY’s founder, and DeWayne Wickham, who writes primarily on matters of race but on other subjects as well. That leaves plenty of room for other views from across the nation by well-known and lesser-known names alike.

Leading the nation through hard times wasn’t easy. We’d like to suggest that President Obama take a closer look at how President Reagan dealt with that “economic hardship,” and how he steered the nation toward what would turn into its longest peacetime economic expansion. It’s a cautionary tale — one that involves the greatest domestic error of his administration.

In 1981, President Reagan’s plan for revitalizing the economy was a four-fold one:

1) Reduce tax rates across the board.

2) Decrease unnecessary regulations.

3) Work with the Federal Reserve to maintain stable monetary policy.

4) Slow the growth of federal spending.

President Reagan got his tax-rate cuts through Congress later that year. But because they were being phased in gradually, the economic pain they were designed to alleviate lingered well into 1982. High deficits persisted, and he faced enormous pressure to raise taxes.

The president had no interest in increasing taxes, but he agreed to consider some kind of compromise with Congress. His representatives began meeting with members of House Speaker Tip O’Neill’s team to find some way to hammer out a deficit-reduction pact. So began what, in our opinion, became the “Debacle of 1982.”

From the outset, the basic idea of the GOP participants was to trade some kind of concessions on the tax front for a Democratic agreement on spending cutbacks. The negotiators knew that Ronald Reagan would be hard to sell on any tax hikes. So they included a ploy they felt might overcome his resistance: a large reduction in federal spending in return for a modest rise in business (but not individual) taxes.

The ratio in the final deal — the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) — was $3 in spending cuts for every $1 in tax increases. It sounded persuasive at the time. Believing it to be the only way to get spending under control, most of the president’s colleagues signed on. He disliked the tax hikes, of course, but he agreed to it as well.

Click Here to continue reading

Who STILL Wants Tax Hikes? President Obama & His Chairman, Tim Kaine

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
July 26, 2011

Who STILL Wants Tax Hikes?  President Obama & His Chairman, Tim Kaine

Henrico, VA – After President Obama’s speech last night it is clear there are only a handful of Washington Democrats still calling for massive job-killing tax hikes on Americans.  Two of them are former Democratic National Committee Chairman Tim Kaine and President Barack Obama. 

This weekend, in his Daily Press op-ed, Chairman Kaine echoed President Obama’s belief that the only way to solve our spending problems is with a “balanced approach” that increases taxes on the very people we’re counting on to create jobs and get the economy growing again.  (Daily Press, 7/24/11)

But even the New York Times reported that recent studies show tax hikes do four times more damage to economic growth than do spending cuts. (New York Times, 7/17/11)

In contrast, George Allen, in a Daily Press op-ed published the same day as Chairman Kaine’s, called for short-term and long-term solutions that will force Washington to live within its means with reforms like meaningful spending cuts, enforceable caps and a Balanced Budget Amendment to the Constitution.

“As top advocate for the Washington’s explosive spending policies that made annual trillion dollar deficits the norm, it’s not surprising that Chairman Kaine is the one of last Democrats still standing with President Obama on massive tax hikes,” said Bill Riggs, Allen campaign spokesman.  “Job-killing tax increases and more government spending won’t solve our debt crisis, it will only jeopardize jobs and hurt an already anemic economy.  It’s clear that Chairman Kaine would be a Senator for President Obama and his Washington allies, while George Allen would be a Senator for Virginia.”
 

###

Cantor & Goodlatte: Change culture of spending

Eric Cantor and Bob Goodlatte are right on target.  This balanced budget amendment is essential for long-term fiscal discipline to spend our tax money efficiently, on priorities of national security and otherwise stay out of our lives and businesses. 

Cantor & Goodlatte: Change culture of spending

Richmond Times Dispatch

By Eric Cantor & Bob Goodlatte

July 18, 2011

Imagine if your government were as focused on saving money as it is on spending money.

Flash back to March 2, 1995. On that day, the U.S. Senate failed — by one vote — to send a balanced budget amendment to the states for ratification. The amendment had previously passed the House by the required two-thirds majorit, and the Senate vote was the last legislative hurdle before ratification by the states.

If that amendment had passed, then we would not be facing the fiscal crisis we now face. If that amendment had passed, then balancing the budget would have been the rule rather than the exception, and we wouldn’t be facing the annual deficits and skyrocketing debt that we must address today.

Once again we are standing at a crossroads. The decisions we make today will determine the direction of our country for years to come. We can take action now to ensure that our children will face a much brighter fiscal future. We must not allow ourselves to miss this opportunity.

We all know that Washington has a spending problem. In recent years, federal spending has increased at an unsustainable pace, allowing our national debt to spiral out of control. The annual deficits and the resulting debt continue to grow due to political pressures and dependence on government programs.

Just as any family or business has to do, Washington needs to learn to live within its means so that we can continue to focus on growing the economy, creating jobs and getting people back to work.

Short-term spending cuts are necessary to begin to get our fiscal house in order but will not be enough without long-term changes. That’s why a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution is the only way to ensure that Congress curtails its spending on an annual basis regardless of which party is in control.

This week, the House of Representatives will vote on a three-part balanced budget amendment that would amend the Constitution to (1) require that total spending for any fiscal year not exceed total receipts; (2) require that bills to raise revenues pass each House of Congress by a two-thirds majority; and (3) establish an annual spending cap such that total federal spending could not exceed 18 percent of the economic output of the United States.

Click Here to continue reading

The American Comeback Starts with Small Businesses

The path to an American economic comeback starts with small businesses.  But economic uncertainty due to reckless spending, massive debt and burdensome regulations are deterring many small businesses looking to expand and hire more employees.  America’s tax rate on job-creating businesses is 35% – the second highest in the world.  We need to lower this job-killing burden on small, medium and large businesses to a competitive 20 percent.  That one step alone would create over 500,000 new jobs a year by giving small businesses the certainty and confidence to invest, expand and hire.

The Best Way to Increase Revenue is With New Jobs, Not Higher Taxes

The best way to increase revenue is to help create new jobs with pro-growth policies. American job-creating businesses are already facing the second highest tax rate in the world – the last thing anyone should be talking about is raising taxes. America can’t afford to give Washington a blank check to continue the reckless policies that created this fiscal crisis in the first place. We need to reduce taxes, unleash our energy resources and rein in reckless spending with ironclad cuts and a Balanced Budget Amendment.

Obama picks fight on taxes, big or just symbolic

Associated Press

July 1, 2011

President Barack Obama is renewing an old fight with the business community by insisting that $400 billion in tax increases be part of a deficit-reduction package. His proposals have languished on Capitol Hill, repeatedly blocked by Republicans, often with help from Democrats.

Some would raise big money. Limiting tax deductions for high-income families and small business owners could raise more than $200 billion over the next decade. Others are more symbolic, such as scaling back a tax break for companies that buy corporate jets.

The corporate jet proposal would raise $3 billion over the next decade, according to GOP congressional aides. That’s a relatively small sum in the big scheme of Washington budgets, but Obama and Democrats call attention to it repeatedly in their effort to portray Republicans as defenders of corporate fat cats.

No matter how Democrats characterize their proposals as revenue raisers or plugging tax loopholes, GOP leaders oppose them all, arguing that raising taxes in a bad economy would only make matters worse.

Click here to continue reading:

Cut, Cap and Balance Pledge

Today, I signed the ‘Cut, Cap and Balance’ Pledge to oppose raising the debt ceiling unless there are binding conditions that reduce the deficit, cap spending and balance the budget. It’s time to put an end to the wasteful and reckless spending in Washington, DC.

Click Here to view the Pledge

George Allen Signs “Cut, Cap and Balance” Pledge

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

June 20, 2011

George Allen Signs “Cut, Cap and Balance” Pledge

Richmond, VA – Today, George Allen signed the Cut, Cap and Balance Pledge – a promise to oppose any increase in the national debt limit without first meeting the following three conditions:

•             Cut – Substantial cuts in spending that will reduce the deficit next year and thereafter.

•             Cap – Enforceable spending caps that will put federal spending on a path to a balanced budget.

•             Balance – Congressional passage of a Balanced Budget Amendment to the U.S. Constitution—but only if it includes both a spending limitation and a super-majority for raising taxes, in addition to balancing revenues and expenses.

“The ‘Cut, Cap and Balance’ Pledge represents the same policies and principles that I have consistently fought for while representing the people of Virginia.  These provisions are essential to reining in out-of-control spending in Washington, DC by making sure that any increase in the national debt limit is tied to ironclad spending cuts and long-term fiscal restraint. 

“In just a little over four years since Democrats took control of the Senate, the national debt has shot up over 60 percent, and trillion dollar deficits have become the norm.   We cannot give this White House and Senators Harry Reid and Chuck Schumer another blank check to fund their over-spending, over-reaching federal government. 

“I have long supported immediate and meaningful cuts in wasteful spending.  As far back as 1992, as a Representative for the 7th District of Virginia, I introduced a Balanced Budget Amendment to the Constitution.  And as a U.S. Senator, I proposed a Balanced Budget Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, a Line-Item Veto Amendment, and a ‘paycheck penalty’ that would withhold a member’s salary if the appropriations bills were not passed on time. 

“The federal government’s exploding debt has become a national crisis and our leaders in Washington have an obligation to act.  Our current path is dangerous and unsustainable; it will endanger our children’s future and their ability to achieve the American Dream. 

“I am proud to sign the ‘Cut, Cap and Balance’ Pledge to oppose raising the debt ceiling unless there are binding conditions that reduce the deficit, cap spending and balance the budget.  It’s time to put an end to the wasteful and reckless spending in Washington, DC.” 

###